RuneRebels

Miscellaneous Boards => Off Topic => Started by: D E A T H on March 14, 2014, 08:57:20 pm

Title: Civil war?
Post by: D E A T H on March 14, 2014, 08:57:20 pm
I was just wondering if any of you guys see a war with America against America. I'm talking about the rich and the poor. Washington does nothing to help us poor but the rich will get out of anything from killing millions to having sex with children. I just see more tension rise around. I'm not saying like next year but maybe in like 50 years. Was wondering your opinions.  :o
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 14, 2014, 09:02:30 pm
Nope.
Too much in between ground that nobody ever seems to ever remember...

Now once the middle class is completely weeded out, then MAYBE.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: realitycheck on March 14, 2014, 09:50:34 pm
Going 50 years forward is extremely tough - just look 50 years back and look at the differences.  In 50 years, humanity could be wiped out by a number of things.  However, as far as another Civil War in America, not a chance.  The imbalances are there, but I don't think they will ever get severe enough to cause war.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Cheshire Cat on March 14, 2014, 10:32:51 pm
Civil war simply won't happen here. The majority of Americans are brainwashed by their own news channels to a sickening amount and these news groups are allowed to display opinions under the name of facts. That's not to say things won't change though, a few well placed laws could remove funding from insanely idiotic political groups (Super Packs, the legal way to bribe someone), but we'd need a large amount of Americans to get together to get such laws in place, and sad people these days think a protest is equivalent to voting online or writing a "Petition" on the White House site.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 15, 2014, 04:08:41 am
it will happen in the form of secession, not an actual war.. there's no way that would unfold in my opinion.. civilians don't have the technology the US military has..
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Cheshire Cat on March 15, 2014, 06:29:42 am
it will happen in the form of secession, not an actual war.. there's no way that would unfold in my opinion.. civilians don't have the technology the US military has..
With the crazy laws in Texas I'm honestly surprised they haven't declared themselves seceded yet.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 15, 2014, 12:25:30 pm
it will happen in the form of secession, not an actual war.. there's no way that would unfold in my opinion.. civilians don't have the technology the US military has..
With the crazy laws in Texas I'm honestly surprised they haven't declared themselves seceded yet.

They've tried a couple times
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 16, 2014, 04:34:24 am
it will happen in the form of secession, not an actual war.. there's no way that would unfold in my opinion.. civilians don't have the technology the US military has..
With the crazy laws in Texas I'm honestly surprised they haven't declared themselves seceded yet.

They've tried a couple times

We all did here recently.. a lot of the southern states tried to secede but the governors supposedly have the last say so.. but imo.. if the majority wants it then they should get it..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_state_petitions_for_secession (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_state_petitions_for_secession)

I know the Whitehouse petitioning system isn't very accurate but they knew it wasn't going to serve a real purpose before they implemented it or else they would have tracked IP's or had some other way to register users so they couldn't vote multiple times from the same computer.. I can't think of one positive thing that came from that stupid program other than to give idiots the false hope that our federal government cares about them. I believe if there was a straightforward way to implement tracking/registering the votes so people couldn't create "bots" to vote and keep people from voting for different states.. etc. it would have to be legally followed through with. I don't think it's too far fetched.. it's an idea we should keep in the back of our heads at all times.. just like Ron Paul said.. "It’s very American to talk about secession -- that’s how we came into being."

I'm not a big "American" though.. I personally feel like we can govern ourselves state by state without major problems and it would stimulate SO much more passion and progress within the states (think if you currently lived in a state that was mostly dependent on itself to thrive. Entrepreneurship would go through the roof.. people who chose the political route would all have a more direct impact on what they decided for their state and if not would take a bigger lashing from voters because let's face it I personally don't know all my representatives, there's just too many levels and agencies.. that's just the tip of the iceberg though). We are a civilized country and if we can make "treaties" or other agreements with other nations then we could form some kind of pact to not participate in any civil wars or foreign wars unless agreed upon by some type of committee made up of delegates from all 50 states.. Hell, I would consider being more patriotic if our government was smaller, less corrupt, and was held accountable for it's actions.. but that has rarely happened in the past and probably won't ever in the future.. we also have to separate corporations from our government and that would take about half of the problem off of our hands right now that we continually face from our major health crisis to jobs. The other stuff we would need to fix is this welfare state we're in and also in the same push, fix this police state.. quit giving fucking tanks and drones and grenades to local police departments.. law enforcement even in my town of only 10,000 people is so militarized it's scary.

That would make this country a little more livable.. but until that happens.. I'll stay a believer in the CSA

 
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Austin on March 16, 2014, 04:39:42 am
No it won't happen. Like someone previously stated before there is more in the middle class than both poor and rich combined. It just won't happen.  Also, it's not so much the rich that call the shots here... the governement is doing that for us. If anything, people will eventually see how corrupt the government really is. The amendments aren't really doing much for us anymore because if you guys haven't noticed more and more rights have been stripped away these past few years O.o
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 16, 2014, 04:56:18 am
No it won't happen. Like someone previously stated before there is more in the middle class than both poor and rich combined. It just won't happen.  Also, it's not so much the rich that call the shots here... the governement is doing that for us. If anything, people will eventually see how corrupt the government really is. The amendments aren't really doing much for us anymore because if you guys haven't noticed more and more rights have been stripped away these past few years O.o


your last two sentences nailed it.. specifically gun rights.. the right to protest.. free speech.. freedom of press.. etc.. the list goes on for days.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 17, 2014, 12:16:39 pm
it will happen in the form of secession, not an actual war.. there's no way that would unfold in my opinion.. civilians don't have the technology the US military has..
With the crazy laws in Texas I'm honestly surprised they haven't declared themselves seceded yet.

They've tried a couple times

I can't think of one positive thing that came from that stupid program other than to give idiots the false hope that our federal government cares about them.


That was the only reason. It was for crazy people such as the Westboro Baptist Church or 9/11 conspiracy theorists to think they're actually making an effort to be heard when in actuality they're putting up a billboard about their reduced state of mental health.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 17, 2014, 08:31:42 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: James on March 18, 2014, 03:17:14 am
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 18, 2014, 12:31:26 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 18, 2014, 06:59:17 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 18, 2014, 07:28:46 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.
You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 18, 2014, 08:55:30 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 18, 2014, 09:44:10 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me.

Yet you continue to ask him questions...
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 18, 2014, 09:46:11 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me.

Yet you continue to ask him questions...
Of course it does because I am trying to understand why he has the opinion he has. Just because I am curious, does not mean I agree with it.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: James on March 19, 2014, 01:06:39 am
I still think North Dakota could make it on it's own.

Hell, it seems like everyone in the united states flocks here in herds for jobs anyway.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 19, 2014, 02:46:27 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.

Our way of life "got it's ass kicked" because people were brainwashed into thinking the war was over slaves and that the north was trying to abolish slavery. That's the furthest thing from the truth and until you actually read up on the TRUTH of the civil war and look at it from BOTH sides and read REAL historical documents that PROVE the war wasn't about slavery THEN AND ONLY THEN will you realize how wrong you are. Not only is the comment about it being "old" irrelevant but it confirms your hipster status to me. When you said without the federal government there would be no USA? Is that not what I just said before? The states would no longer be UNITED therefore we just have independent states..?? The point of keeping things on a state level would be to keep corporatism down and manage it accordingly. Therefore the rich wouldn't have such an easy time paying off high ranking members of the federal government who will be in those positions until they die. At a state level those guys are in and out every 6 years or less. Again.. you having to reassert that you are an atheist and that's why you don't say the pledge is irrelevant and confirms your hipster status even more.

I guess growing up where you're from you've never heard of moonshine?


(this video was randomly found on youtube)

my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.

Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 19, 2014, 03:03:13 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.
my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.

That is FUCKING AWESOME to say the least. Definitely would like some pictures of that if you've got any lying around
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 19, 2014, 03:06:13 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.
my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.

That is FUCKING AWESOME to say the least. Definitely would like some pictures of that if you've got any lying around

that's borderline incriminating myself hahaha saying it and showing it is 2 different things lol if I find any old pictures from a long time ago I'll post them
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 19, 2014, 03:09:07 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.
my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.

That is FUCKING AWESOME to say the least. Definitely would like some pictures of that if you've got any lying around

that's borderline incriminating myself hahaha saying it and showing it is 2 different things lol if I find any old pictures from a long time ago I'll post them

I realized right after I posted. Some of us do illegal things regularly enough we forget they're illegal sometimes...
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 19, 2014, 03:14:10 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.

Our way of life "got it's ass kicked" because people were brainwashed into thinking the war was over slaves and that the north was trying to abolish slavery. That's the furthest thing from the truth and until you actually read up on the TRUTH of the civil war and look at it from BOTH sides and read REAL historical documents that PROVE the war wasn't about slavery THEN AND ONLY THEN will you realize how wrong you are. Not only is the comment about it being "old" irrelevant but it confirms your hipster status to me. When you said without the federal government there would be no USA? Is that not what I just said before? The states would no longer be UNITED therefore we just have independent states..?? The point of keeping things on a state level would be to keep corporatism down and manage it accordingly. Therefore the rich wouldn't have such an easy time paying off high ranking members of the federal government who will be in those positions until they die. At a state level those guys are in and out every 6 years or less. Again.. you having to reassert that you are an atheist and that's why you don't say the pledge is irrelevant and confirms your hipster status even more.

I guess growing up where you're from you've never heard of moonshine?


(this video was randomly found on youtube)

my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.
Damn.... you're still blind aren't you? The problem isn't federal government. Your only argument is money. The problem is capitalism. Socialism would work much better with a federal government if I do say so myself.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Cheshire Cat on March 19, 2014, 04:00:01 pm
>This thread.

Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 19, 2014, 04:03:57 pm
>This thread.


These types of threads are always stupid. It kind of reared off topic too as the OP is talking of views on a possible future civil war.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 19, 2014, 04:08:39 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.

Our way of life "got it's ass kicked" because people were brainwashed into thinking the war was over slaves and that the north was trying to abolish slavery. That's the furthest thing from the truth and until you actually read up on the TRUTH of the civil war and look at it from BOTH sides and read REAL historical documents that PROVE the war wasn't about slavery THEN AND ONLY THEN will you realize how wrong you are. Not only is the comment about it being "old" irrelevant but it confirms your hipster status to me. When you said without the federal government there would be no USA? Is that not what I just said before? The states would no longer be UNITED therefore we just have independent states..?? The point of keeping things on a state level would be to keep corporatism down and manage it accordingly. Therefore the rich wouldn't have such an easy time paying off high ranking members of the federal government who will be in those positions until they die. At a state level those guys are in and out every 6 years or less. Again.. you having to reassert that you are an atheist and that's why you don't say the pledge is irrelevant and confirms your hipster status even more.

I guess growing up where you're from you've never heard of moonshine?


(this video was randomly found on youtube)

my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.
Damn.... you're still blind aren't you? The problem isn't federal government. Your only argument is money. The problem is capitalism. Socialism would work much better with a federal government if I do say so myself.

don't know if troll ooooorrr???

I've never once mentioned money as being something we need. I've told you over and over the southern states could be completely independent due to agriculture ALONE. Food, Fuel, Clothing/Textiles, the list could go on for days.. if we wanted luxuries and modern day gadgets then we could always introduce trade but as far as what we need to survive and be thrive.. we have it all.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 19, 2014, 04:50:07 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.

Our way of life "got it's ass kicked" because people were brainwashed into thinking the war was over slaves and that the north was trying to abolish slavery. That's the furthest thing from the truth and until you actually read up on the TRUTH of the civil war and look at it from BOTH sides and read REAL historical documents that PROVE the war wasn't about slavery THEN AND ONLY THEN will you realize how wrong you are. Not only is the comment about it being "old" irrelevant but it confirms your hipster status to me. When you said without the federal government there would be no USA? Is that not what I just said before? The states would no longer be UNITED therefore we just have independent states..?? The point of keeping things on a state level would be to keep corporatism down and manage it accordingly. Therefore the rich wouldn't have such an easy time paying off high ranking members of the federal government who will be in those positions until they die. At a state level those guys are in and out every 6 years or less. Again.. you having to reassert that you are an atheist and that's why you don't say the pledge is irrelevant and confirms your hipster status even more.

I guess growing up where you're from you've never heard of moonshine?


(this video was randomly found on youtube)

my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.
Damn.... you're still blind aren't you? The problem isn't federal government. Your only argument is money. The problem is capitalism. Socialism would work much better with a federal government if I do say so myself.

don't know if troll ooooorrr???

I've never once mentioned money as being something we need. I've told you over and over the southern states could be completely independent due to agriculture ALONE. Food, Fuel, Clothing/Textiles, the list could go on for days.. if we wanted luxuries and modern day gadgets then we could always introduce trade but as far as what we need to survive and be thrive.. we have it all.
You actually did mention money once and it has been your only argument since. Even if you think agriculture is a thing in its own, its still money since you also think trading will work between the "north" and "south." There will be grudges and many companies from both sides will refuse to trade with eachother.

You really are like every other idiot out there. Refuse to think of the big picture. You're thinking for what you think will do the best for YOU, not the rest of the country. Helping eachother is the only way to go. I have no doubt you are a Republican since all of your views are liberal, so that just proves to me more your stance on the matter.

And by the way, slavery WAS the main cause of the Civil war. Not the only cause, but the MAIN cause. I know the civil war also helped the power of state governments and the federal government be balanced, which is another good thing that came out of the civil war. I don't agree with any of your beliefs what so ever because you support a cause that was ended over a HUNDRED YEARS AGO.

Its a radical belief. Any cause that wants to overthrown the federal government is treason. I support the government that makes this country what it is. If you're unhappy with it, than by all means move to another country. Simply whining about something that was ended LONG ago will get you no where because it will never happen.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Tennessee on March 19, 2014, 07:53:31 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.

Our way of life "got it's ass kicked" because people were brainwashed into thinking the war was over slaves and that the north was trying to abolish slavery. That's the furthest thing from the truth and until you actually read up on the TRUTH of the civil war and look at it from BOTH sides and read REAL historical documents that PROVE the war wasn't about slavery THEN AND ONLY THEN will you realize how wrong you are. Not only is the comment about it being "old" irrelevant but it confirms your hipster status to me. When you said without the federal government there would be no USA? Is that not what I just said before? The states would no longer be UNITED therefore we just have independent states..?? The point of keeping things on a state level would be to keep corporatism down and manage it accordingly. Therefore the rich wouldn't have such an easy time paying off high ranking members of the federal government who will be in those positions until they die. At a state level those guys are in and out every 6 years or less. Again.. you having to reassert that you are an atheist and that's why you don't say the pledge is irrelevant and confirms your hipster status even more.

I guess growing up where you're from you've never heard of moonshine?


(this video was randomly found on youtube)

my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.
Damn.... you're still blind aren't you? The problem isn't federal government. Your only argument is money. The problem is capitalism. Socialism would work much better with a federal government if I do say so myself.

don't know if troll ooooorrr???

I've never once mentioned money as being something we need. I've told you over and over the southern states could be completely independent due to agriculture ALONE. Food, Fuel, Clothing/Textiles, the list could go on for days.. if we wanted luxuries and modern day gadgets then we could always introduce trade but as far as what we need to survive and be thrive.. we have it all.
You actually did mention money once and it has been your only argument since. Even if you think agriculture is a thing in its own, its still money since you also think trading will work between the "north" and "south." There will be grudges and many companies from both sides will refuse to trade with eachother.

You really are like every other idiot out there. Refuse to think of the big picture. You're thinking for what you think will do the best for YOU, not the rest of the country. Helping eachother is the only way to go. I have no doubt you are a Republican since all of your views are liberal, so that just proves to me more your stance on the matter.

And by the way, slavery WAS the main cause of the Civil war. Not the only cause, but the MAIN cause. I know the civil war also helped the power of state governments and the federal government be balanced, which is another good thing that came out of the civil war. I don't agree with any of your beliefs what so ever because you support a cause that was ended over a HUNDRED YEARS AGO.

Its a radical belief. Any cause that wants to overthrown the federal government is treason. I support the government that makes this country what it is. If you're unhappy with it, than by all means move to another country. Simply whining about something that was ended LONG ago will get you no where because it will never happen.

lolololol my gosh this shows you're stupidity.. democrats=liberal.. republicans=conservative... I'm neither.. because it's all bullshit to separate the country and make us think we're really making a difference. I have very conservative views but don't consider myself a republican. Also, I didn't say we should overthrow the government but I do believe the government is too big. I think everything could run a whole lot smoother if the government was smaller and our foreign policy was the complete opposite of what it is now. And I'm tired of the argument that because something is old it makes it suck. You're playing a 2006 remake of runescape.. which must mean the 2006 version was better.. but in your logic it would automatically suck because it's older and jagex has came along with something new which automatically makes it better.. again.. you're an idiot.. I'm also not thinking about what would work for just me because if it was honestly up to me I'd turn back the hands of time and redo this whole clusterfuck from the 1700's until now. Again.. you're being brainwashed by our federal government to think any view other than what they show on TV is "radical".. you're part of the reason our generation is turning into mindless zombies with no way to think for themselves.. and your last sentence stating that I should stop whining about something that ended a long time ago.. well.. read the fucking thread you're posting in. A question was asked, I answered, you looked like an ass... end of story. I'm not replying to anymore of your dumbfounded arguments because I've blasted every single one of them out of the water and you've proven over and over that you can't educate yourself. All you repeat is the same old shit and can't comprehend that the world would be a lot better off without the United States federal government.
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 19, 2014, 08:04:30 pm
There isn't a single state in this country that would be able to pay for itself. Seceding would end up in them returning to the Country. Every state plays a vital role in the country's economy, and if a state were to secede, then they would not have access to those goods without going through international tax and other things such as grudges owners of companies may have on that state.

All in all, most people are too stupid to realize the rich is fucking everyone else over. So no, unless some maricle happens where the 95% of Americans become smart all the sudden, then nothing will happen.

False.

Right now, if North Dakota succeeded from the nation, We'd be the fourth most powerful country in the world.

We have more Oil, Military bases, Military equipment, agricultural land, bomb shelters, and Nuclear missiles than most other stats.

Our state government is so rich that they have said many times they have no clue what to spend it on.
Agriculture, textile, food, etc. Its more than just money. And you'd think the US would let the state keep all the military supplies? More like they'd come in and take it all back if you were to not give it back.

RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN.. RiiPiiN..

again.. agriculture=life

if we went on a state by state basis.. solar, hydro, natural gas with fuel cells (bloom box for instance), along with ethanol (from corn which falls under agriculture which you love to bash so much).. could take the place of oil. Also clothes/produce all comes from agriculture so your last statement made no sense. We grow cotton/hemp (clothes, rope, all other textiles).. we grow corn, switchgrass, and hemp for alternative fuels.. Corporations wouldn't have that much power without the government so that wouldn't be a big problem.. and another thing.. where does the US get 90% of all of our shit? OTHER COUNTRIES. So why would trading be such a big deal between states? ESPECIALLY when it doesn't have to cross an ocean or other body of water? Also, unless the rest of the US was willing to invade North Dakota (which it wouldn't) they wouldn't have to give shit back.. All of that would be theirs. To them, there is no more federal government above them.

In my opinion, we could all live a lot better with no federal government.. because what binds every state together in the first place? The FEDERAL government. Not state or local governments. So in reality if you could picture no federal government then that's what secession would look like. Tell me again why states wouldn't be able to function without it? It's not like once the federal government is gone everyone would turn to hating the state next to them and not let them trade, etc.

and WE ALL KNOW the rich is fucking everyone over. So how is staying plugged into this system everyone is getting fucked over by a good thing!? SECESSION IS ABOUT GETTING AWAY FROM BEING FUCKED OVER BY THE RICH! lol it amazes me how you go on about the rich fucking us over but still love to pledge allegiance to the flag that makes it all possible. It's like these hipsters screaming "illuminati" like they're smart and shit and talking about how they run the world but continue to watch MTV and buy into the clothing and music industries that make these families control us even more. You're like, the ultimate hipster bro.
Mr Confederate, everything you say means nothing to me. As we've discussed before, we will never be on agreeable terms. And by the way, I don't say the pledge. I don't like our government with the status its at with money controlling it. I love the structure, and without federal government, there would be no USA. So Mr Confederate, please explain to me why you to continue to support a belief that got it's ass kicked over 150 years ago? Its out dated. Simply getting rid of the the federal government would not simply fix the "rich fucking us over" as the coorporations would just move onto the next highest level of government in the hierarchy.

I would also like to point out that I am an antheist so thats another reason I don't say the pledge.

Oh also... I would love evidence that corn turning into ethanol could possibly create a viable replacement for oil. Not that I am a supporter of oil, but I believe you do not understand the process which involves turning corn to ethanol.

Our way of life "got it's ass kicked" because people were brainwashed into thinking the war was over slaves and that the north was trying to abolish slavery. That's the furthest thing from the truth and until you actually read up on the TRUTH of the civil war and look at it from BOTH sides and read REAL historical documents that PROVE the war wasn't about slavery THEN AND ONLY THEN will you realize how wrong you are. Not only is the comment about it being "old" irrelevant but it confirms your hipster status to me. When you said without the federal government there would be no USA? Is that not what I just said before? The states would no longer be UNITED therefore we just have independent states..?? The point of keeping things on a state level would be to keep corporatism down and manage it accordingly. Therefore the rich wouldn't have such an easy time paying off high ranking members of the federal government who will be in those positions until they die. At a state level those guys are in and out every 6 years or less. Again.. you having to reassert that you are an atheist and that's why you don't say the pledge is irrelevant and confirms your hipster status even more.

I guess growing up where you're from you've never heard of moonshine?


(this video was randomly found on youtube)

my family has been running the same 200 gallon still on the same farm since 1856 and we still use it to fuel our farm truck.
Damn.... you're still blind aren't you? The problem isn't federal government. Your only argument is money. The problem is capitalism. Socialism would work much better with a federal government if I do say so myself.

don't know if troll ooooorrr???

I've never once mentioned money as being something we need. I've told you over and over the southern states could be completely independent due to agriculture ALONE. Food, Fuel, Clothing/Textiles, the list could go on for days.. if we wanted luxuries and modern day gadgets then we could always introduce trade but as far as what we need to survive and be thrive.. we have it all.
You actually did mention money once and it has been your only argument since. Even if you think agriculture is a thing in its own, its still money since you also think trading will work between the "north" and "south." There will be grudges and many companies from both sides will refuse to trade with eachother.

You really are like every other idiot out there. Refuse to think of the big picture. You're thinking for what you think will do the best for YOU, not the rest of the country. Helping eachother is the only way to go. I have no doubt you are a Republican since all of your views are liberal, so that just proves to me more your stance on the matter.

And by the way, slavery WAS the main cause of the Civil war. Not the only cause, but the MAIN cause. I know the civil war also helped the power of state governments and the federal government be balanced, which is another good thing that came out of the civil war. I don't agree with any of your beliefs what so ever because you support a cause that was ended over a HUNDRED YEARS AGO.

Its a radical belief. Any cause that wants to overthrown the federal government is treason. I support the government that makes this country what it is. If you're unhappy with it, than by all means move to another country. Simply whining about something that was ended LONG ago will get you no where because it will never happen.

lolololol my gosh this shows you're stupidity.. democrats=liberal.. republicans=conservative... I'm neither.. because it's all bullshit to separate the country and make us think we're really making a difference. I have very conservative views but don't consider myself a republican. Also, I didn't say we should overthrow the government but I do believe the government is too big. I think everything could run a whole lot smoother if the government was smaller and our foreign policy was the complete opposite of what it is now. And I'm tired of the argument that because something is old it makes it suck. You're playing a 2006 remake of runescape.. which must mean the 2006 version was better.. but in your logic it would automatically suck because it's older and jagex has came along with something new which automatically makes it better.. again.. you're an idiot.. I'm also not thinking about what would work for just me because if it was honestly up to me I'd turn back the hands of time and redo this whole clusterfuck from the 1700's until now. Again.. you're being brainwashed by our federal government to think any view other than what they show on TV is "radical".. you're part of the reason our generation is turning into mindless zombies with no way to think for themselves.. and your last sentence stating that I should stop whining about something that ended a long time ago.. well.. read the fucking thread you're posting in. A question was asked, I answered, you looked like an ass... end of story. I'm not replying to anymore of your dumbfounded arguments because I've blasted every single one of them out of the water and you've proven over and over that you can't educate yourself. All you repeat is the same old shit and can't comprehend that the world would be a lot better off without the United States federal government.
My bad. Didn't realize I said liberal instead of conservative. I do know the difference, was just thinking of liberal at the time. And no, the federal government has not brain washed me. I am more self awhere than you think. I support what works. Unlike you, I don't support lost cause. I support now and the future. If this means to over throw the government for a better America I would participate in it. Just because I state that what you support was ended long ago, does not mean anything thats old is bad. Your analogy is absolutely stupid.

And at you think I am looking like an ass or that you think you've beaten every single arguement I've provided is just nonsense. Maybe in your eyes you're proud of yourself for thinking using big words makes you cooler, but in reality you're making yourself look stupid. Although you don't see yourself as a full republican, you share some nonsense radical belief which would make me think your even worse than the classic republican.

And at anyone reading this, I have no problem with a republican who can put up an educated fight regarding modern beliefs and using modern facts to support your arguement. But this is a lost cause that this kid is supporting. You haven't blown a single of my arguements out of the water. Like most other people who don't have an answer, you changed the subject that you think I don't understand. I think for myself and I know the government much better than you as it seems. I suggest retaking the classic highschool government class that you seemed to not pay attention in. Perhaps you would then be someone worth argueing with. Your opinions are silly and make me and every other person who reads this laugh. Lost cause. All that needs to be said. No one is going to reply here saying they agree with me because they don't want to get involved with this, but they know what they're thinking and I can almost guarentee you're one of .001% of america that supports this radical, lost cause. Without the federal government, you would most likely not even be here. Its more than your puny brain could comprehend. Which is probably why you don't support it. You don't understand it. I think I just found the reason. ::)
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Cheshire Cat on March 19, 2014, 08:07:34 pm
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 19, 2014, 08:11:00 pm
Lets just end the thread at this: http://www.historynet.com/the-confederacy-americas-worst-idea.htm
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: buttplug on March 19, 2014, 08:55:51 pm
Lets all agree opinions are like assholes

Everyone has one and they all fucking stink

Now everyone shut the fuck up I'm trying to listen to WHY CAN'T WE BE FRIENDS
Title: Re: Civil war?
Post by: Stuart on March 19, 2014, 08:57:32 pm
Lets all agree opinions are like assholes

Everyone has one and they all fucking stink

Now everyone shut the fuck up I'm trying to listen to WHY CAN'T WE BE FRIENDS
Probably because of your buttplug. :)