Sold my Rune Scim before the release of "RuneRebels 2.0" under the impression that Lost City would of been released, since it's been so long I may as well buy one back because it doesn't look like I'll get my dscim for a while.

Let me know the price, here preferably, won't be online until someone replies that they'll sell me one.

Oh my, pking will take a long time to begin :3 (RR Coma Joke) anyways welcome man.

Quote from: ZzReVeNg3zZ on July 29, 2014, 05:51:10 pm

Quote from: James on July 29, 2014, 05:32:54 pm

Quote from: Gh0stPred on July 29, 2014, 04:08:47 pm

Quote from: Brothership on July 29, 2014, 04:04:00 pm

Quote from: ZzReVeNg3zZ on July 29, 2014, 11:54:37 am

I dont like saying it but it's the truth, Ryan needs to sort himself out or hire someone to do his job for him in the time being.

I 100% agree on this. Ryan is literally the only thing stopping runerebels right now.

Well why don't we make Onur owner till Ryan can do shit?

That would not solve anything. Making him an owner gives him no more priveledges than a developer. I know it from experience.

What are the specific things we're waiting on Ryan for then? Because if owner is pretty much the same as developer what is it that people keep mentioning Ryan has to do?

Ryan is the only one with the source code, and of what ive understand, hes the only one that can do big things in the game. The devs can only add small things like npcs and drops (please right me if im wrong, im not totally sure). So we need ryan to work on the project or for ryan to give the code to some of the other owners and devs. But if i dont remember this wrong, no one else than ryan can code in his special way, as its like his form of handwriting (again right me if im wrong).

A source code is a source code dude, as far as I'm aware there's no personal style its just general coding like.

I'm guessing its a lack of trust, as the source code is essentially RuneRebels itself, a rogue staff member could completely steal it.

I need more popcorn. This thread made the forums a bit more alive again. Its always nice seeing a new post once every hour. Thanks for the debate, it made my life a tad more entertaining.

Now lets get back on topic (even if i have completely forgot it under your extremely entertaining discussion) shall we?

I dont like saying it but it's the truth, Ryan needs to sort himself out or hire someone to do his job for him in the time being.

Now it looks to me like you're blowing things completely out of proportion by taking the time to analyse every paragraph I've written, maybe its because you've got too much time on your hands, who knows.

I figured I'd take the time to give it a go using your style of discussion, I decided I'd  share with you what you seem to be getting wrong by breaking it down bit by bit, only because your general understanding is at a dangerously low level.

Unable to quote as I'm on a mobile device, so bare with me.

Let's begin.

"They're a newer server, not new."

From this we can see that you're agreeing with me, which is funny because it hasn't seemed like it. New is new at the end of the day, an iPhone that's 3 months old isn't brand new, but it's NEWER than the previous model, so it's simply new..

Looking at it with this logic, 2006Revived is new compared to RuneRebels (what I've been saying all along).

"It's not surprising that a newer server has an equal amount of players.
They have good updates, more complete server than ours, most
probably better staff/players who are active."

This is what I was getting at when I mentioned how it's funny how the tides change, once a strong part of the RSPS community is now only level with a server that came about recently, that's how mediocre things are becoming, you said it yourself "more complete server than ours" which I feel strange considering the duration of time its been up compared to RR.
 
"This is rich considering what you've fallen victim of no more than 1
page ago."

Am I wrong in thinking that you were the one who responded to my post in the first place?

"I'm yet to see where you've said this numerous times."

Clearly you don't pay much attention to any of my other posts located on various different threads, which I understand to be honest because I pay no attention to your posts either, but just in case you feel like having a look more specifically, all you have to do is look at previous posts on my profile, simple enough.

"So at first you're saying I was sharing an argument but then you
change it up and insist that I'm not seeing what you're saying. I
completely see what you're saying and it was wrong, hence why i
corrected it to make it accurate."

Completely incorrect, you've missed my entire point from the first minute you read it, which is why for some strange reason you pass it off as wrong. It is not specific about times and dates, it is about the sheer fact that;

A) A much, much new(er) *put the "er" in for you to understand better* server has managed to generate the same amount of interest as this one.

B) And you said it yourself, even a server put online in March already has much more content than this one.

"So if i may add this, you have a problem with being wrong. You've taken what I said way to personally, all I did was correct a part in your post and you've turned into a sook."

Although I may of reacted inappropriately, I have no problem being wrong what-so-ever, I've already agreed that my time estimations were wrong, what irritated me was that you focussed on the minor problems of what I was saying instead of taking the time to think about what I meant in t first place.

"When you're wrong don't just cry and start a fight."

That's an interesting phrase, wise words, yet I've accepted my errors and you still fail to interpret what we're even discussing.

And finally,

"As Buttplug said, this didn't need to start. You didn't have to come
back and start flaming just because I corrected something you said,
and just from that you've turned the topic into something it wasn't
intended to be."

I think you're absolutely right, this didn't need to start, however it isn't exactly diffusing the situation for you to come and write an essay or some kind of synopsis with a more detailed analysis than an A* English exam.

And the harm is already done to be honest, for those of you reading this I am sorry that this fuss has occurred, this is legitimately the first time I've ever argued with someone on the RuneRebels forums, and I also intend it to be the last.

I'm also apologising on behalf of Elevate, because for some reason I fail to see the possibility of him ever doing so.

This isn't your personal flame war thread, ZzReVeNg3zZ. He corrected an error you made. If you have a problem with that, then its YOUR problem.

Likewise, however if you have a problem with what I've got to say then that's YOUR problem. I wasn't addressing you and never intended to.

Quote from: ZzReVeNg3zZ on July 28, 2014, 09:21:57 am

I find it funny how you always have to be right, it's damn annoying, it's been up like 2 months I believe which is nothing, so clearly you should be able to understand my point without being smart about it.

March. Was released for public access in March, that's just from looking at the forums. So it's been at least 4 months. I don't call 4 months a "couple of weeks". No I'm not able to understand what you're saying.

If by me informing you that the server has been out for longer annoys you then I really do feel for you. If you get annoyed that easily then the Internet is not the place for you. For everyone else; My previous replies were aimed to prove that 2006 servers are no longer the "in thing".

I 100% agree that 2006 is no longer popular, I've previously said this numerous times.

What I'm telling you is (and I do not understand how you fail to grasp this) is that 2006 Revived is a recent edition to the 2006 scene (regardless of how recent it is, it's a hell of a lot newer than RR) thus it is surprising how a NEW server can generate as much attention as one that's been going strong for 2 years (I believe, again, regardless of my time estimations it is obvious what I'm getting at).

As to "the internet not being the place for me", I have no problem with people sharing their arguments on these forums what-so-ever, even if I disagree with them, what I do have a minor problem with is when despite giving my best attempt to explain to you what I meant numerous times, you still fail to see what I'm saying and tend to take note of the minor errors rather than seeing the bigger picture.

I've forgotten who actually said this quote, but a man made a point saying something along the lines of;

"The problem with many people is that they listen with intent to reply, not to learn or understand."

Quote from: ZzReVeNg3zZ on July 26, 2014, 10:18:50 pm

@James

In regard to the server that has 90% completion, are you talking about 2006Revived, as that only popped up a few weeks back and is soaring with interest at the moment, crazy how fast the tides change in this industry haha.

"Soaring with interest"

There's 4 people online as of right now. Please do explain?

My point still stands, for a game that was set up weeks ago it makes me chuckle at how its still got the same player base as RuneRebels which has been running for so much longer.